| 2006, 3 |
O.M. Mazo |
[Review of:] В. Zeisler. Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages: a comparative study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004. xxv, 986 p. |
147-151 |
| 2005, 6 |
Konstantin G. Krasukhin |
Aspects and tenses of the Indo-European verb |
3-30 |
| 2005, 6 |
Natalia A. O’Shea |
The Gallian and Lepontian forms of the preterit: traditions, innovations, dialectal distribution |
31-43 |
| 2005, 5 |
A.S. Nikolaev |
Toch. A śamantär and the Indo-European preterit with prolonged ablaut in the root |
68-83 |
| 2004, 6 |
T.V. Mikhailova |
[Review of:] E.Y. Chirkova. In search of time in Peking Mandarin |
138-140 |
| 2003, 6 |
Timur A. Maisak, S.R. Merdanova |
The future tense in the Agul language: A typological study |
76-107 |
| 2003, 5 |
Dmitri V. Sitchinava |
On the typology of verbal systems having several forms of plusquamperfect: casus latinus |
40-52 |
| 2003, 2 |
Viktor S. Xrakovskij |
The category of taxis (general characteristics) |
32-53 |
| 2003, 1 |
Beatrisa B. Khodorkovskaya |
The rise of the perfect in Latin and the origin of the element -is-/-er- |
63-77 |
| 2002, 3 |
Galina A. Zolotovа |
The category of tense and aspect in the light of text study |
8-29 |
