| 2024, 5 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Russian kak as a temporal conjunction: Synchronic, diachronic and typological perspective |
7-24 |
| 2023, 1 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
What micro-diachronic analysis can tell us about unmarked indefinites: Evidence from Russian |
19-53 |
| 2021, 4 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Pied-piping in Russian relative clauses: A microdiachronic analysis |
42-71 |
| 2018, 6 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Subject ellipsis in the main clause in Russian and the typology of correlatives |
31-59 |
| 2016, 5 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Pronoun ETO as a means of modifying truth value (a case study of ESLI P, ETO Q ‘if p, it is q’ construction) |
49-78 |
| 2015, 2 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
The marker to as a means for highlighting implicative relations (case study of esli… to ‘if… then’ conjunction). |
55-96 |
| 2014, 4 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Infinitive vs. čtoby-clause: Choosing the strategy of sentential argument marking in Russian. |
13-45 |
| 2013, 4 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Partial agreement with subjects linked by a correlative conjunction: A corpus-based study of main regularities. |
55-86 |
| 2012, 2 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Twoplace coordinative conjunctions: A corpus-based study. |
10-44 |
| 2008, 1 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Semantics of causality and communicative structure: Russian потому что and поскольку. |
66-84 |
