| 2018, 2 |
Alexander B. Letuchiy |
Russian constructions with semi-auxiliary verbs and adjectives: The puzzle of complement clause. |
7-28 |
| 2017, 6 |
Anna A. Pichkhadze |
Slavic nominative construction with verbs of perception, thought, and speech. |
7-19 |
| 2017, 5 |
Natalia V. Serdobolskaya |
Asyndetic complement clauses with the Russian verb dumat’ ‘thinkʼ. |
7-35 |
| 2016, 5 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Pronoun ETO as a means of modifying truth value (a case study of ESLI P, ETO Q ‘if p, it is q’ construction) |
49-78 |
| 2014, 6 |
Svetlana Yu. Toldova, Natalia V. Serdobolskaya |
Verb of speech manaš in Mari: Grammaticalization properties. |
66-91 |
| 2014, 4 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Infinitive vs. čtoby-clause: Choosing the strategy of sentential argument marking in Russian. |
13-45 |
| 2012, 5 |
Alexander B. Letuchiy |
Some features of sentential arguments in Russian. |
57-87 |
| 2005, 6 |
Olga V. Fedorova |
BEFORE or AFTER: what is simpler (complex sentences with temporal clauses) |
44-58 |
