| 1999, 1 |
I.A. Perelmuter |
[Review of:] M. Sabanééva. Essai sur l’évolution du subjonctif latin. Problèmes de la modalité verbale |
162-164 |
| 1997, 5 |
Nikolai N. Kazansky |
[Review of:] A. L. Sihler. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995 |
145-150 |
| 1997, 3 |
Wolf Dietrich |
The historical development of New Greek in comparison with the formation of the Romance languages from Vulgar Latin |
95-114 |
| 1996, 6 |
Beatrisa B. Khodorkovskaya |
On the anaphoric pronouns in the Italic languages |
84-90 |
| 1994, 3 |
Beatrisa B. Khodorkovskaya |
[Review of:] Latein und Indogermanisch. Akten des Kolloquiums der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Salzburg, 23–26 September, 1986 |
142-146 |
| 1993, 2 |
Beatrisa B. Khodorkovskaya |
On the pre-history of the infect/perfect tense system in Latin and Osco-Umbrian (The formation of the system of perfect) |
58-68 |
| 1990, 3 |
М.А. Таривердиева |
Latin conjunctive in complex sentences (The typology of meanings) |
92-103 |
| 1989, 6 |
Beatrisa B. Khodorkovskaya |
On the root-vocalism of the Indo-European sigmatic aorist (Vocalism of sigmatic formations of the verb in Latin) |
5-19 |
| 1989, 6 |
Ю.В. Откупщиков |
Vowel-gradation of the root in Latin sigmatic forms |
20-22 |
