| 1999, 4 |
V.G. Demianov |
[Review of:] S. Mengel. Wege der Herausbildung der Wortbildungsnorm im Ostslawischen des 11-17. Jahrhunderts |
137-141 |
| 1999, 2 |
V.N. Shaposhnikov |
On the territorial and functional structure of the Russian language in the end of the XX century |
50-57 |
| 1998, 6 |
L.E. Kalnyn’ |
Inclusion of dialectisms in the text of the belles-lettres as a kind of contact between dialectal and literary forms of the Russian language |
58-68 |
| 1998, 5 |
A.A. Pletneva |
Discussion on Old Church Slavonic in the end of the 19th century. Position of advocates of the archaic theory |
67-73 |
| 1996, 6 |
V.M. Zhivov, Helmut Keipert |
The importance of I.V. Paus's grammar for the development of Russian grammatical tradition |
3-30 |
| 1995, 3 |
A.A. Kerimova |
The main trends in the development of contemporary Tajik literary language |
118-126 |
| 1995, 1 |
Vladimir M. Alpatov |
The literary language in Russia and Japan (an experiment in comparative analysis) |
93-116 |
| 1994, 3 |
Soia Koester-Thoma |
[Review of:] Sprachlicher Substandard I–III. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1986–1990 |
150-154 |
| 1992, 1 |
Alexander A. Sokolyansky |
Problems of historical orthoepy of the Russian language (In connection with the publication of M.V. Panov’s book “History of the Russian literary pronunciation in XVIII–XX centuries”) |
87-100 |
| 1990, 1 |
K. Lerner |
The sociolinguistic factors contributing to the evolution of a grammatical category (founded on the material illustrating the history of the Georgian language) |
89-100 |
