| 2019, 6 |
Maria N. Sheveleva |
On Old Russian verb iměti, possessive constructions and complex future with imamь / imu in early East Slavic texts |
32-50 |
| 2019, 4 |
Alexey A. Gippius |
Birchbark letters from Veliky Novgorod and Staraya Russa excavations of 2018 |
47-71 |
| 2019, 4 |
Anna A. Pichkhadze |
Infinitive complement clauses in Old Russian |
72-84 |
| 2019, 4 |
Pavel V. Petrukhin |
[Review of:] S. Dekker. Old Russian birchbark letters: A pragmatic approach. Leiden: Rodopi, 2018. 200 p. ISBN 9789004362383. |
155-160 |
| 2018, 5 |
Maria V. Skachedubova |
On the interpretation of l-forms without auxiliary used in pluperfect contexts in Hypatian Chronicle and The First Novgorodian Chronicle. |
64-76 |
| 2018, 4 |
Alexey A. Gippius, Andrey A. Zaliznyak |
Birchbark letters from the Novgorod and Staraya Russa excavations of 2017. |
7-24 |
| 2017, 6 |
Anna A. Pichkhadze |
Slavic nominative construction with verbs of perception, thought, and speech. |
7-19 |
| 2017, 4 |
Alexey A. Gippius, Andrey A. Zaliznyak, Elena V. Toropova |
Birchbark letters from Novgorod and Staraya Russa excavations of 2016 |
7-24 |
| 2017, 3 |
Alexey A. Kozlov |
T. Nesset. How Russian came to be the way it is: A student’s guide to the history of the Russian language. Bloomington (IN): Slavica Publishers, 2015. xxvi, 361 p. ISBN 978-0-89357-443-7. |
125-132 |
| 2016, 5 |
Tatiana I. Afanasyeva |
On a special usage of Dative Absolute in Russian translations of the late 14th century. |
95-102 |
