| 2009, 1 |
F.I. Dudčuk |
Field studies of two Turkic languages: limits of description and explanation |
126-138 |
| 2008, 4 |
Yakov G. Testelets |
A. Pereltsvaig. Copular sentences in Russian. A theory of intra-clausal relations. |
131-136 |
| 2006, 4 |
Peter M. Arkadiev |
[Review of:] Explorations in nominal inflection / G. Miiller, L. Gunkel, G. Zifonun (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004. - vi + 405 p. |
112-119 |
| 2006, 2 |
Dmitry V. Gerasimov |
[Review of:] A. Carnie; H. Harley; M. Willie (eds.). Formal approaches to function in grammar: In honor of Eloise Jelinek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003. xii, 378 p. |
139-144 |
| 2005, 5 |
Sergey A. Minor |
[Review of:] К. Hale, S.J. Keyser. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge (MASS): MIT press. 2002. x + 286 p. |
138-145 |
| 2005, 3 |
Sergei G. Tatevosov |
[Review of:] Events as grammatical objects. The converging perspectives of lexical semantics and syntax / Ed. by С. Tenny, J. Pustejovsky. Stanford: CSLI publications, 2000. x, 510 p. |
125-133 |
| 2005, 1 |
P. Kosta |
[Review of:] Ya.G. Testelets. Introduction to general syntax |
142-148 |
| 2001, 3 |
Elena L. Rudnitskaya |
Local and non-local reflexives in Korean from the typological point of view: formal or pragmatic description? |
83-95 |
| 1998, 4 |
Konstantin I. Kazenin |
Nominal modifiers in Tsakhur and locality constraints in syntax |
111-123 |
| 1998, 3 |
Vladimir A. Plungian |
[Review of:] Selected essays of Catherine V. Chvany |
183-187 |
