| 2023, 3 |
Alexander B. Letuchiy |
Russian colloquial complement clauses with čto: Quotative use and other special properties |
27-59 |
| 2019, 5 |
Natalia V. Serdobolskaya, Anastasia D. Egorova |
Morphosyntax of non-standard constructions with to čto in Colloquial Russian |
41-72 |
| 2019, 5 |
Nina R. Dobrushina |
[Review of:] N. Evans, H. Watanabe (eds.). Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016. xii + 435 pp. (Typological Studies in Language, 115.) ISBN 9789027206961 (print); 9789027266545 (online). |
154-159 |
| 2019, 4 |
Anna A. Pichkhadze |
Infinitive complement clauses in Old Russian |
72-84 |
| 2017, 5 |
Elena V. Uryson |
Adverbial prepositions as a subclass of adverbs |
36-55 |
| 2016, 5 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Pronoun ETO as a means of modifying truth value (a case study of ESLI P, ETO Q ‘if p, it is q’ construction) |
49-78 |
| 2015, 5 |
Elena V. Paducheva |
Ontological classification of verbs and the semantics of Russian conjunction poka ‘while’. |
7-25 |
| 2015, 2 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
The marker to as a means for highlighting implicative relations (case study of esli… to ‘if… then’ conjunction). |
55-96 |
| 2014, 6 |
Svetlana Yu. Toldova, Natalia V. Serdobolskaya |
Verb of speech manaš in Mari: Grammaticalization properties. |
66-91 |
| 2014, 4 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Infinitive vs. čtoby-clause: Choosing the strategy of sentential argument marking in Russian. |
13-45 |
