2017, 2 |
Valentina Apresjan |
Double semantic roles in direct and metaphorical meanings of polysemous verbs. |
7-32 |
2017, 2 |
Evdokia A. Valova, Natalia Slioussar |
Syntactic properties of the Russian enclitic že: Corpus-based and experimental approaches. |
33-48 |
2017, 2 |
Dmitri V. Sitchinava |
I. A. S eržant, B. W iemer (eds.). Contemporary approaches to dialectology: The area of North, North-West Russian and Belarusian dialects. Bergen: University of Bergen, 2014. 401 p. (Slavica Bergensia 13). ISBN 978-82-90249-38-5. |
139-147 |
2017, 1 |
Elena V. Paducheva |
On the semantics of Russian aspect in the context of discourse. |
7-23 |
2017, 1 |
Elena V. Gorbova |
Aspectual formation of Russian verbs: Inflection, derivation, or a set of quasigrammemes? (“sore points” of Russian aspectology revisited). |
24-52 |
2017, 1 |
Alexander B. Letuchiy |
Russian adverbials with temporal meaning TOL’KO, TOL’KO-TOL’KO, and TOL’KO ČTO: Recent past meaning and resultative semantics. |
53-73 |
2016, 6 |
Pavel V. Grashchenkov |
Morphology — a view from syntax. |
7-35 |
2016, 6 |
Gerd Hentschel |
Regular variation or «chaos»: The question of usus in mixed linguistic varieties — the case of Belarusian «Trasyanka». |
84-112 |
2016, 6 |
Sofia Yu. Semenova |
M. B. Tashlykova. Semanticheskie etyudy o «sintaksicheskoi derivatsii» [Semantic studies on syntactic derivation]. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IGU, 2013. 277 p. ISBN 978-5-9624-0976-4. |
130-135 |
2016, 5 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
Pronoun ETO as a means of modifying truth value (a case study of ESLI P, ETO Q ‘if p, it is q’ construction) |
49-78 |