Microsyntax in Russian phraseology


2025. №5, 30-43

Anatoly N. Baranov

Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; baranov_anatoly@hotmail.com

Dmitrij O. Dobrovol’skij

Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; dobrovolskij@gmail.com

 

Abstract:

The article examines the semantics and derivational history of reduplicated idioms vot-vot (lit. ‘here-here’), ni-ni (lit. ‘no-no’) and t’fu-t’fu (lit. ‘fie-fie’). In spite of the formal transparency of reduplicated idioms, their semantics is unpredictable and specific for every unit. In addition, their origin cannot be reduced to a single algorithm. The semantics of the idiom vot-vot is based on the reduplication of the deictic gesture, which, in the process of semantic evolution, has moved from spatial to temporal domain. In the next step of semantic development, the idiom vot-vot obtained the function of agreement. In contrast, the reduplicated idiom ni-ni inherited the idea of negation from the single ni, and is not related to deixis. The idiom t’fu-t’fu appears to go back to the gesture of folk magic to protect from evil, which differs significantly in function from the gesture of discontent, contempt, or indifference that accompanies the interjection t’fu. The specific features of the genesis of reduplicated idioms have a direct impact on their actual meanings.

For citation:

Baranov A. N., Dobrovol’skij D. O. Microsyntax in Russian phraseology. Voprosy Jazyko­znanija, 2025, 5: 30–43.