| 2006, 4 |
Alexander B. Letuchiy |
[Review of:] A. Levin-Steinmann. Die Legende vom Bulgarischen Renarrativ. Bedeutung und Funktionen der kopulalosen l-Periphrase. München: Otto Sagner, 2004. 382 S. |
133-140 |
| 2004, 2 |
Tatiana I. Reznikova |
[Review of:] Reported discourse. A meeting ground for different linguistic domains / Ed. by T. Gtildemann, M. von Roncador. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. - xi, 423 p. |
129-134 |
| 2001, 5 |
R.Z. Muryasov |
Some problems of contrastive aspectology |
86-112 |
| 2000, 5 |
Timur A. Maisak, Sergei G. Tatevosov |
The “space” of the speaker as expressed in categories of grammar: what is impossible to say of one's own self |
68-80 |
| 1999, 3 |
Andrej L. Malchukov |
The perfect and evidentiality in the Tungusic languages (an essay in functional and diachronic analysis) |
119-132 |
| 1999, 3 |
A.P. Volodin, N.A. Kozintseva |
[Review of:] Z. Guentchéva (Ed.). L’énonciaton médiatisée |
145-153 |
| 1997, 6 |
B.Ya. Ostrovsky |
Evidentiality and perfect forms (founded on the materials of the Dari language) |
75-88 |
| 1994, 3 |
N.A. Kozintseva |
The category of evidentiality: Problems of typological analysis |
92-104 |
