| 2023, 1 |
Olga E. Pekelis |
What micro-diachronic analysis can tell us about unmarked indefinites: Evidence from Russian |
19-53 |
| 2022, 2 |
Oleg F. Zholobov, Victor A. Baranov |
Transformations of the lexical row životъ — žiznь — žitije in Slavic: A linguostatistical analysis |
65-101 |
| 2021, 5 |
Dmitry V. Gerasimov |
[Review of:] K. Schmidtke-Bode, N. Levshina, S. M. Michaelis, I. A. Seržant (eds.). Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of evidence. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2019 |
150-160 |
| 2021, 3 |
Aleksandr Yu. Zheltov |
Noun classification in Niger-Congo in synchrony and diachrony: Typology, history of study, problems, prospects |
120-141 |
| 2020, 1 |
Dmitri V. Sitchinava |
[Review of:] J. J. N. Adams, Nigel Vincent (eds.). Early and Late Latin: Сontinuity or change? Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016, xx + 470 p. ISBN 9781107132252. |
148-154 |
| 2020, 1 |
Dmitry S. Nikolaev |
[Review of:] Gard B. Jenset, Barbara McGillivray. Quantitative historical linguistics: A corpus framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 256 p. ISBN 9780198718178. |
155-160 |
| 2018, 6 |
Pavel V. Grashchenkov |
Review of: M. Norde, F. van de Velde (eds.). Exaptation and language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016. viii, 411 p. ISBN 978-90-272-6747-4 |
139-147 |
| 2018, 5 |
Elena V. Paducheva |
Some remarks on the language of Leo Tolstoy and small-scale diachronic shifts. |
49-63 |
| 2018, 3 |
Qiang Si |
Diachronic changes in the system of Chinese aquamotion verbs from the viewpoint of lexical typology. |
128-146 |
| 2017, 3 |
Alexey A. Kozlov |
T. Nesset. How Russian came to be the way it is: A student’s guide to the history of the Russian language. Bloomington (IN): Slavica Publishers, 2015. xxvi, 361 p. ISBN 978-0-89357-443-7. |
125-132 |
